03-12-2006, 22:57
|
|
|
חבר מתאריך: 08.11.06
הודעות: 219
|
|
גם בצבא ארה"ב קולות הקוראים לרפורמה
Mission Statement: An elite group composed of military professionals, aircraft and ground vehicle designers and civilians dedicated towards creating an excellent U.S. military capable of defending freedom both at home and abroad that has a moral compass. When performing its missions, its fully self-sufficient using ISO containerized "BATTLEBOXES" and aircraft-delivered (forced entry) ground maneuver units that are tracked, mechanized and x-country capable to execute decisive 3D maneuver alone or in concert with enhanced 2D maneuver forces.
דוגמה לאחד מהמחקרים (טקסט מעולה לדעתי על יעילות וריאליסטיות האימונים וכיצד לשפרם, פלוס אבחנות על שדה הקרב המודרני ורוויית כלי הנשק מסויימים בו):
Explosive battlefield effects not simulated properly: U.S forces on the non-linear battelfield
MILES Simulations leading us to the wrong conclusions about the battlefield
OUR TTP, THEIR RPGs
Do Combat Engineers shoot bunkers anymore?
MILES "lessons learned" has harmed Combat Engineers by over the years marginalizing the utility of the 165mm demolition gun on the now retired M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle, which has no gun-equipped replacement. Instead, the institutional success of the Desert Storm AFV stampede in the open deserts of the Middle East has made mine breeching/clearing the main emphasis instead of the more likely urban conflict obstacles/building demolition. A generation of Soldiers is being taught to run up to an obstacle to hand emplace a demolition charge because Armor branch hasn't fielded a high explosive plastic round for its tanks, and CTCs will not simulate the explosive effect regardless. Engineers are the main way to reduce casualties in maneuver warfare. they have the ability to protect units in the defense and overcome terrain that is not favorable to maneuver. When we use them just in breaching operations we have already failed. Obviously we can't always bypass strong defenses but where possible we should and we can do that by using Engineers to move us over and through unfavorable terrain at night and in bad weather. There couldn't possibly be anything more satisfying than pinning an enemy unit against there own strong defenses by attacking them from the rear. The British having to retreat through there own mine fields in North Africa after being out maneuvered by the Afrika Corps comes to mind. Sherman using two "Flying Columns" to sweep through the south in the U.S. civil war to destroy the enemy's logistical ability to wage war and going to ground when he actually had to fight is another example. Engineers preparing strong defensive positions (RPG Screens in the ground?) on short notice can reduce our casualties and increase theirs. Rocket volley/barrage fire not done in training, not a viable tactic
|